May 10, 2022
In General Discussions
Combined efficiency and effectiveness is the main driver of two-step ranking processes. Use the most compute-intensive resources on the most important documents to achieve the highest accuracy, because that's where it matters most. Full ranking is t Mexico Phone Number List he first stage with reranking as the second stage for improvements on the top-k Mexico Phone Number List extracted from the full collection. By the way, that's probably also why google's danny sullivan said in a may tweet, "If you're in the top 10, you're doing it right." since then, the top 10 is probably the most important part of the top-k in the reclassified 'accuracy' stages. And maximum features and accuracy 'learning' will have been undertaken for these results. Improving the second stage of the classification (accuracy) was the goal given the importance of the second stage of ranking for accuracy, the majority of Mexico Phone Number List research on ranking improvements focuses on this stage – the reranking stage. Getting the most out of bert, for now we know that bert in its 2018/2019 format was limited. Notably by the length of the sequence . The limits of the context window, as well as by the expenses, in spite of the appearance of smaller models. How do you make bert better than a “nice to have” deal with only the most nuanced disambiguation needs in phrase-level web search, and into Mexico Phone Number List something meaningfully usable? Something that many researchers might also Mexico Phone Number List associate with? Bert repurposed as pass and re-rank binder aha… bert as a passing workbook. Again, to reinforce the limitations of bert and its ideal current use: “bert has issues with input sequences longer than 512 tokens for a number of reasons.